

|
Preliminary Hearing: This meeting, conducted by the arbitrator, is the first opportunity for the parties and the arbitrator to discuss the substantive issues of the case. Here, procedural matters such as the exchange of information, witness lists, and so forth, may be discussed.Parties prepare their presentations, and the arbitrator addresses any impasses or challenges related to sharing of information. The goal here is to arrive at the point where evidence and arguments may be effectivly presented at the hearings. Hearings: At this point, parties have an opportunity to present testimony and evidence to the arbitrator in order to determine a resolution. The arbitrator may from time to time adjourn proceedings to consider information and/or to conduct independent research. Post-Hearing Submissions: This is available as a process to provide parties with an opportunity to submit additional documentation, if the arbitrator allows. If this necessary, it usually occurs shortly after the hearings. The Award: |
Disclosures:
Be aware:
1) the primary
purpose of West Mediation is to assist parties to reach a mutually
acceptable resolution of their dispute;
2) West Mediation cannot, and
will not, provide legal advice to either or both parties;
3) any documents
used and prepared by West Mediation are to be ancillary to the
mediation/arbitration process and are not intended to constitute legal advice;
4) West Mediation is not obligated to identify or resolve legal issues
beyomd the confines of the arbitration process;
5) the parties’ settlement
may be waiving or compromising legal rights; and
6) it is the responsibility
of the parties to obtain legal advice if they so choose.
Be
advised: Dr. Crosby is not a lawyer, and does not
represent himself as a lawyer. At no point will an Attorney/Client relationship
be formed or allowed between a mediation/arbitration client & Dr.
Crosby.
Dr. Crosby does bring to bear a
wealth of experience and education to the mediation/arbitration process.
Any
advice offered by Dr. Crosby is mere personal opinion and only offered upon
request and/or ancillary to the negotiation/mediation/arbitration process by
identifying and evaluating alternatives. In addition, Dr. Crosby may make observations which are an
obvious matter of fact or logic, may give feedback from the perspective of how
the mediator/arbitrator would react if he were a juror hearing this information,
and may ask questions to reality-test a party's expectations and understanding.
Links to Mediation
Information:
Mediation
Now
The Mediation
Channel
Beyond
Intractability
Definitions from
Wikipedia
Mediate:
Everything Mediation